Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than Moto Z's general score of 74.5. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is noticeably newer, but heavier and extremely thicker than Moto Z. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version, so it provides you some nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels amount in each display inch.
The Galaxy Fold takes clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a lesser mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 68 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.