Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z, having a 78.9 score against 74.5. The Samsung Galaxy M20 design is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z's, but it's notably thicker and way heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Moto Z features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z features a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Motorola Moto Z also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a much better battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 92% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.