Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Brown and Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M33 has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the Moto Z's general score of 74.5. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M33 has the previous 12 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Despite being the best in this comparison, Galaxy M33 is a incredibly thicker and noticeably heavier phone than Moto Z.
The Moto Z features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M33, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Moto Z has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M33, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy M33 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy M33 features a superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh. The Motorola Moto Z counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M33, although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 13 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.