Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Moto Z, with a overall score of 98.9 against 74.5. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a lot newer than the Moto Z's, although it is way heavier and notably thicker.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster CPU than Moto Z, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Moto Z, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.