Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting an 80.7 score against 74.5. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy Note 3 is a incredibly older, somewhat heavier and notably thicker cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z.
Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a much lower display pixel density and a much lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Moto Z has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (although slower) and an additional graphics co-processor. The Galaxy Note 3 features better battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, they both have the same video frame rate, a camera with a 13 MP and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.