Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 general score. The Galaxy Note10 construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and much thicker than Motorola Moto Z. Moto Z has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note10 features a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.