Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 general score. Even though Galaxy Note10 Lite is notably newer than the Motorola Moto Z, it's heavier and notably thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Moto Z has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way better battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 73 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.