Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Moto Z's 74.5 overall score. The Galaxy Note7 is a noticeably thicker and heavier cellphone than Moto Z. Motorola Moto Z features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Motorola Moto Z also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
Motorola Moto Z counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note7. Both of them have a Quad-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note7's camera is very similar to the Motorola Moto Z one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a lower video quality and a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Moto Z counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.