Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than Moto Z's 74.5 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a way newer phone than the Moto Z, but it's somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker.
Galaxy S10 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit better screen than Moto Z, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a little larger display and a just a little better display density.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy S10 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 31% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is also the cheapest, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.