Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is a lot better than Moto Z's general score of 74.5. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S10 5G is a noticeably newer phone than the Moto Z, although it's noticeably thicker and much heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper display than Moto Z, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a less MP resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs more than Moto Z, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.