Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is way better than the Moto Z's overall score of 74.5. Even though Galaxy S10 Lite is newer than Moto Z, it's much heavier and extremely thicker. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels density.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy S10 Lite takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.