Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z, having a general score of 90.8 against 74.5. Although the Galaxy S20 FE is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z, it's way thicker and a lot heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). Motorola Moto Z has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a better camera than Moto Z, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a lesser mega pixels camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
The Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.