Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z's, but it's a lot thicker and noticeably heavier. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster). Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than Moto Z, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.