Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is way better than Moto Z's 74.5 score. Galaxy S22's construction is incredibly newer than Moto Z's, but it's heavier and way thicker. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much better looking screen than Moto Z, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little larger display. Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a lot better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than Moto Z, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.