Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z's overall score of 74.5. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z's, although it is notably thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Moto Z, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bigger display. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a way better video definition.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than Moto Z, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.