Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S23 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting a 77.9 score against 74.5. Galaxy S23 is a incredibly lighter but noticeably thicker cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S23 has older 13 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Motorola Moto Z features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S23, although it has 4 less cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Moto Z counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy S23, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Galaxy S23 takes clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S23 also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. Moto Z features a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S23, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S23 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.