Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 FE is just a bit better than Moto Z, having a global score of 76 against 74.5. Galaxy S24 FE's body is extremely thicker and way heavier than the Moto Z. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S24 FE has older 14 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z, because although it has a way lower pixels count per inch in the screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Moto Z features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 13 megapixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S24 FE features a way better battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto Z, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.