Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 Ultra has a score of 80.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z's global score of 74.5. The Galaxy S24 Ultra has Android OS, and Motorola Moto Z works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Galaxy S24 Ultra is a noticeably lighter and notably thinner phone than the Motorola Moto Z.
The Moto Z has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra features a very superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 92% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z, because it has a way better 200 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.