Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is much better than the Moto Z's 74.5 global score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S25 design is much thinner and notably lighter than the Moto Z.
The Motorola Moto Z has a way better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a sharper display than Moto Z, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. The Moto Z counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S25 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto Z, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.