Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Moto Z's general score of 74.5. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner phone than the Moto Z.
The Moto Z counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Moto Z, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Moto Z, because it has a camera with way more megapixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.