Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is slightly better than the Moto Z, with a 77.6 score against 74.5. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has the previous 12 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a much newer cellphone than Moto Z, but it is way heavier and noticeably thicker.
Moto Z features a lot better processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster). Moto Z counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery size.
Moto Z captures a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a much less mega-pixels back facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.