Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Moto Z's overall score of 74.5. Both of these phones use the same Android 8.0 Oreo operating system, so both should count with the same operating system features. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer device than the Moto Z, although it's incredibly thicker and notably heavier.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better processing power than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger number of faster cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a little bit higher pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Moto Z has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z captures better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a more MP camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior battery performance than Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.