Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Moto Z, having a overall score of 85.6 against 74.5. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is notably newer than Moto Z, it's a lot thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better performance than Moto Z, because it has 4 more cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Moto Z features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto Z features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 27% larger battery size.
The Motorola Moto Z has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto Z also has a better 13 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto Z, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.