Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Moto Z, with a 90.6 score against 74.5. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is incredibly newer than Moto Z, it is incredibly thicker and noticeably heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 8 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto Z takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back-facing camera with a higher 13 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a really longer battery performance than Moto Z, because it has a 69 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.