Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a score of 84.5, which is much better than Moto Z's 74.5 score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi 14T Pro has the previous 14 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi 14T Pro body is extremely newer than the Moto Z's, although it's a lot heavier and a lot thicker.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Moto Z, because although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. The Moto Z counts with a much powerful processing unit than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has less cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a camera in the back with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better low light images.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features a way better battery performance than Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.