Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blasting black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is much better than Moto Z's global score of 74.5. These phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has older 10 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is way newer than Moto Z's, although it is notably thicker and a lot heavier.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and Moto Z both have very similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has better video frame rate and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.