Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than Moto Z, with an 83.8 score against 74.5. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is newer than the Moto Z's, but it's a lot heavier and notably thicker. Moto Z has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 31 percent more battery size. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s captures clearer videos and photos than Moto Z, although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.