Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is much better than Moto Z, with an 89 score against 74.5. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is newer than Moto Z, it's heavier and extremely thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has older 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a bit better performance than Moto Z, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory. Moto Z counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 takes way better photographs and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a camera with much more mega-pixels. Moto Z counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a really longer battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.