Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a score of 80.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite body is way newer, but noticeably heavier and way thicker than Motorola Moto Z. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has 11 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more 2200 MHz CPU cores. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in Moto Z, because although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a way worse amount of pixels in each screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen.
Moto Z features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a way more MP back camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a way better battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite costs more money than the Moto Z, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.