Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Motorola Moto Z, having an 87.9 score against 74.5. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z, it is thicker and incredibly heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a way lower screen pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger display. Motorola Moto Z features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than Moto Z, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.