Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a global score of 78.7, which is a little bit better than Moto Z's 74.5 score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has older 10 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's design is incredibly newer, but way heavier and way thicker than the Moto Z.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a greater number of cores. Moto Z features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a much more MP back-facing camera. The Motorola Moto Z features a bit more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.