Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an overall score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z's general score of 74.5. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's construction is way newer, but extremely heavier and notably thicker than Motorola Moto Z. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cores. Motorola Moto Z has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution. Moto Z has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a superior battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.