Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is much better than the Moto Z's score of 74.5. These phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro body is a lot newer than the Moto Z's, although it's a lot thicker and extremely heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z, because although it has a much lower pixels amount per inch of screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. Motorola Moto Z counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit better CPU than Moto Z, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a way better camera than Moto Z, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.