Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is slightly better than Moto Z, having a general score of 77.1 against 74.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has an older 11 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G design is incredibly thicker and heavier than Moto Z.
Moto Z has a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 2080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 92 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.