Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is slightly better than Moto Z, with a 77.2 score against 74.5. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a newer 8.1 Oreo version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version, providing the user some additional features. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro construction is notably newer, but noticeably thicker and extremely heavier than the Moto Z.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a processor that is just as good as the Moto Z one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Moto Z counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 54 percent larger battery size.
The Motorola Moto Z features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.