Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than the Moto Z, with a global score of 81.1 against 74.5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is much newer than Moto Z's, although it's extremely thicker and much heavier. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Moto Z has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs a bit more money than Motorola Moto Z, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.