Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a 93.2 score against 77.4. IPhone 13 Pro Max's body is extremely newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is way heavier and much thicker. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a more powerful processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a greater amount of RAM.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1284 x 2778 and a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max captures a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a lot bigger camera aperture. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a much better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max costs more than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.