Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2020) is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having an 81.5 score against 77.4. The iPhone SE (2020) body is noticeably newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is a little heavier and thicker. Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with a faster processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit more vivid display than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a bigger display, a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot higher screen density. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a camera with a 12 megapixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) also counts with a larger camera aperture and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has 2730mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.