Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2017-08-10 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a general score of 88.1 against 77.4. Apple iPhone X's construction is a lot thicker and heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The iPhone X has a bit superior CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone X features a little bit better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite lower 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
IPhone X's battery duration is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition one, although the iPhone X has just 2716mAh battery capacity. Apple iPhone X takes a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution and the same video resolution, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a larger camera aperture and better video frame rate.
IPhone X costs a lot more than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.