Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 82 against 77.4. The Apple iPhone XR body is newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is noticeably heavier and notably thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone XR counts with just a bit better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR has a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone XR also has a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 8 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Apple iPhone XR is also cheaper, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.