Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black glare |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a global score of 86.3, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. The Asus ROG Phone 3 design is much newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is noticeably thicker and much heavier. Asus ROG Phone 3 has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a way worse pixels number per inch of screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Asus ROG Phone 3 features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 120% more battery capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 3 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a way better video definition, a camera with much more MP and a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.