Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a global score of 81.1 against 77.4. The Google Nexus 6 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it must be noted that it's also much older, incredibly thicker and incredibly heavier. The Google Nexus 6 counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Google Nexus 6 features just a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior memory to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Nexus 6 features better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3220mAh of battery capacity. The Moto Z2 Force Edition captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera and a lower video definition, they both have a same size camera aperture.
The Google Nexus 6 costs more than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.