Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-10 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a score of 82.5 against 77.4. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it is also thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a screen that's very similar to the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition one, although the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. Google Pixel 2 XL shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a more MP camera, a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 2 XL features greater battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.