Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Although Google Pixel 3 is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's a little heavier and way thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a just a bit better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Google Pixel 3's processor is very similar to the Moto Z2 Force Edition one, both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh. The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Google Pixel 3 also has a bigger camera aperture, a higher resolution camera and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.