Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 80.7 against 77.4. Google Pixel 3 XL is a newer phone than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's incredibly thicker and way heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features a CPU that is very similar to the Moto Z2 Force Edition one, they have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a display that's very similar to the display in Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although the Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a little bit larger screen. Google Pixel 3 XL shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3 XL has improved battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.