Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Although Google Pixel 3a is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is a lot thicker and a little bit heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little higher amount of pixels in each inch of display.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh. Google Pixel 3a takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 3a also has a more megapixels camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture and a bigger back camera sensor.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 3a is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.