Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. The Google Pixel 4 is a newer phone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it is a lot thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger camera aperture, a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.