Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is notably newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's extremely heavier and much thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of pixels in each screen inch, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photographs, a larger aperture and a back camera with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a very superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.