Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. The Google Pixel 4a design has the same weight than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it is incredibly thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a bit better amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 4a takes clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger back-facing camera sensor, a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a better 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 4a has just a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.