Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's somewhat heavier and extremely thicker. The Google Pixel 4a 5G's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a camera with more mega pixels, a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, faster video frame rates and a larger aperture to capture better low light images.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.